![]() Eschewing recognition of such complexities, the narrative drive of the film relies on a temporal and spatial transition that places familial reconciliation in a postconflictual present and in a location far removed from the communal devastation the miners' defeat brought about. But this is made possible through the film's problematic and schematic treatment of history, since it suppresses any consciousness of the solidarities with the miners that were formed, or attempted, by working-class women, feminists, and lesbian and gay activists. ![]() ![]() That trajectory is symbolically freighted with challenges to gender and sexual normativity, specifically, to the masculinity of the working-class miners. Written during the twenty-fifth anniversary of the 1984–85 miners' strike, this article considers the film in relation to this decisive moment in the transition to neoliberalism in Britain, recognizing its sympathy for the miners as well as the ideological limitations to that sympathy generated by the focus on Billy's trajectory out of his class and toward the metropolis. Most discussions of Billy Elliot have either taken for granted an understanding of the historical event that it treats or failed to engage with that context completely.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |